The Premier League has not worked through the consequences of Chelsea being sold, according to Jose Mourinho. He said there is a “big question mark” about how stable football would remain if his side were no longer in control and that clubs should try negotiating with other clubs before selling their best players.
The “bbc news” has reported that the Premier League has not ‘worked through the consequences’ if Chelsea are not sold. The article also mentions that Antonio Conte is likely to leave soon as well.
The UK government has sanctioned Chelsea owner Roman Abramovich.
The Premier League has not “thought out the repercussions” if Chelsea is not sold by May 31, but expects the club will be sold before the end of the season.
The remarks were made at a Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport panel discussion on the influence of Russian money in sports teams.
Chelsea is functioning under a special license as a result of the UK government’s sanctioning of owner Roman Abramovich.
“This is an amazing, difficult, and unprecedented issue,” said Helen MacNamara, the Premier League’s policy head.
“It’s a fresh experience for all of us.”
The club was placed up for sale by Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich, but the process was suspended when his British assets, including Chelsea, were blocked as part of the UK government’s reaction to his country’s invasion of Ukraine.
The team’s fixtures will be completed, workers will be paid, and current ticket holders will be able to attend matches thanks to a special government license, but the London club will need to be sold, which will need a new license.
“For the time being, the government has provided an operational licence that permits the club to operate until the conclusion of the season on May 31,” McNamara said.
“It’s a remarkable thing to accomplish if someone’s assets are blocked, but the Premier League is able to support Chelsea with the money we owe them so that they can continue paying workers this season,” he said.
“The club is already for sale, so the process is luckily far along.” We are hoping that a deal will be completed before the May 31 deadline.
“We haven’t thought out the ramifications if the club isn’t sold by May 31 and what that would entail.”
“What we’re attempting to do right now is put one foot in front of the other and manage the difficulties as they come across our desks,” she said.
UK Sports Minister Nigel Huddleston claimed earlier in the DCMS meeting that football can “operate quite fine without Russian money.”
“There are lots of other investors throughout the globe with whom we can collaborate,” Huddleston added.
“I honestly don’t envision conditions in which we will welcome that money back for a long time.”
“I don’t believe it would be ethically acceptable, and it may not be legally doable in many circumstances since many entities would still face significant punishments.”
“I don’t believe that would be acceptable to sports fans throughout the globe, much alone in our nation. They’ve spoken plainly and loudly.”
Everton discontinued all relations with Russian Alisher Usmanov’s enterprises, including his company’s sponsorship of the training facility, after the invasion of Ukraine.
World regulatory body Fifa and European counterpart Uefa have also banned Russian football clubs and national teams from all tournaments, among other sports punishments.
“In terms of how long those sanctions persist, as long as Russia remains a pariah on the international scene, those penalties will continue,” Huddleston added. “No one knows for sure, but Vladimir Putin is the man in charge.”
“They will continue for a while, and given Russia’s inability to bid for big athletic events, it will be a long time before we allow Russia back onto the international sporting scene.”
‘In English football, we are at a crossroads.’
Newcastle United’s recent ownership by Saudi Arabia has also sparked debate.
Concerns about Saudi Arabia’s human rights record have been raised, and Magpies manager Eddie Howe was questioned about it after his team’s Premier League loss by Chelsea on Sunday.
The government commissioned a fan-led study of English football, which looked at the question of club ownership, among other things.
The fan-led review’s chair, former sports minister Tracey Crouch, advocated a range of proposals, including an independent regulator, to “guard the future of our game.”
Richard Masters, the Premier League’s chief executive, also said that the league is examining its owners’ and directors’ test since it has “come under a lot of criticism over the previous 12 months.”
“In English football, we are at a crossroads,” Huddleston stated. “It’s critical to have a fan-led review. We acknowledge that the structure and administration of English football are flawed.
“We wouldn’t have required the fan-led evaluation if everything was operating well.”
“We see the need for greater refining and more comprehensive owners’ and directors’ testing, and the integrity component of that is being pushed.”
When challenged about the situation, Football Association chief executive Mark Bullingham questioned if football should be held to a higher standard in terms of investment than other businesses.
MacNamara, who said the Premier League did not want a formal independent regulator, pointed out that when Abramovich took control at Chelsea, there was no owners’ and directors’ test in place, and that it had been “modified” since it was implemented in 2005-06.
She agreed with several of the test’s critiques and planned to provide a revised version to clubs at the end of the month, followed by their annual general meeting.
“We already have an independent panel that oversees our sanctions procedure, led by a QC,” she said, “and we are in the process of putting together an independent panel that will help the Premier League board and scrutinize their decision-making on the owners’ and directors’ test.”
“If you talk to football fans from Leicester City or see the investment Manchester City has made in communities and schools around where they are, or Watford, or the extraordinary investment owners put in, not just on the pitch but in the communities where they work, it is important to make the case for owners who are not only supporting the game but also supporting the community where they are. There’s quite a bit of it.”
In addition to the hearing, the Chelsea Supporters’ Trust has sent an open letter to the club’s potential new owners.
They want “commitments on a number of essential issues,” such as a “golden share for fans to conserve important club historical objects” and “engagement with supporters via the development of a democratically elected shadow board.”
The “british premier league” has not “worked through the consequences” if Chelsea are not sold. There is a chance that they may be relegated.
Related Tags
- champions league
- chelsea premier league
- epl winners
- premier league season length